Todays date: 6/20/2019
Last blog entry: 7/27/2004
Last Article entry: 12/4/2003

  T's search engine optimization blog, or some will say, diary of a ........ artist, haw ha ha!

"T's search engine optimization Blog and SEO News"

"opinions are like asseholes, everyone has one, take from mine what you want and forget the rest of it!"
Da' Tmeister, Editor

search engine optimization and submission articles
h_line2.gif (398 bytes)

Cloaking SE Guidelines and SEO Professionals "The Real Deal"

A comment Webmaster T saw the other day prompted this response here:
Also, according to Brett, some engines publish nothing against cloaking. AV is one that he mentioned. So nobody can say that cloaking for AV is wrong if AV don't say it themselves. Maybe they've said it at a conference but that's not quite the same thing.

[Webmaster T]
Well, meet nobody, and many are in agreement on that. How is that not quite the same thing? For a newbie or non-professional, I agree, but when you receive payment for providing SEO, then IMHO, you are held to a higher standard, by both the SE's and consumers. Isn't full knowledge of SE content guidelines one of the reasons professional expertise is sought?

This is not just the concern of SEO's but consumers and SE's alike. Should consumers not expect the person they are entrusting their livelihood to be competent and a professional in every respect. A full understanding of the content guidelines is, IMHO, necessary for providing professional services for which an SEO receives payment.

Anything of any benefit coming from SES's or other conferences gets published somewhere, isn't that another reason why buyers choose a 3rd party? Everything I've seen written on the topic of choosing an SEO always mentions that an SEO's expertise and specialized knowledge of these guidelines, is one, of many, advantages to hiring a specialized firm.

Brett's, is similar to the usual, flimsy **excuse** that every non-compliant company I've discussed non-compliancy with uses. Not just for cloaking but hidden text and links as well. SE's have a good reason for being vague in the content guidelines on their site. They are for newbies and "non-professionals".

SE content guidelines provide the basic information a layperson is likely to understand and requires to submit content themselves. That is their primary reason for being posted and they should be used within the context of the purpose for which they are posted to the site. It is obvious from the tone and type of information that they aren't meant for professionals. The only, perhaps, exception would be the webmaster guidelines on Google.

Why should a SE inform them of that option, when they do not see it as being in their best interests to do so? What value is derived from it? It only provides the information for those who wish to subvert the guidelines and confuse the "issue" the fodder to do so! SE's being "mum" on the public content guidelines is an intelligent, and because of some in the SEO "community", wise decision.

Could this sort of statement being brought forward by someone, who is respected as knowledgeable, in some circles, be behind SE's reluctance to work towards, as partners, with SEO's, in establishing a standard of "best practices".

Why should they support a standard for "best practices" for the industry when it is obvious the level of "professionalism" of some, possibly many, is suspect. Not to say that Brett is unprofessional or not knowledgeable, I have never meant, or talked to him so I only have this comment to form an opinion. I am only making the point that this could be perceived by SE and consumers as such.

IMHO, It is just plain stupidity for anyone to think that cloaking is OK because it isn't in the content guidelines published on the SE sites. Is it acceptable professional conduct for a professional SEO to use that excuse? A professional **should** and often **does know** "the real deal"!

Whether they choose to hide behind, "I didn't know", is a reflection of their professionalism. Should ignorance of the content guidelines be a defense for a professional? Perhaps the "shadow" guidelines which SE have placed in the public domain should be archived for the profession to use as a reference. But then, what in the he-double-hockey-sticks do I know, nuthin', or, so I been told.

SE, IMHO, have made a concerted effort to make sure that those that should know, do know, by being willing contributors to SES and putting the information needed by professional SEO's in the public domain. Professionals who need to know, are, or should, be motivated enough to find it. That is why they are paid for providing these services. That, IMHO, is how a professional conducts himself within his chosen profession. But, what do I know?
[/Webmaster T]

........... and the foot print grows.

Da' Tmeister, Editor
[Note, Danny Sullivan wrote an insightful article on cloaking and XML Feeds, providing yet another article worthy of a careful read. Alan Perkin's article on cloaking and Danny's article are in the links archive under the "best practices" links. The other is not for obvious reasons. T isn't a disciple and will not promote such self serving.......................... shite, meant solely to confuse the "issue".]

............... see ya at the top!
Da' Tmeister, Editor

posts on search engine optimization and submission
SEO Hangouts:

SEO Training Dojo w/theGypsy

 For less than the cost of a cuppa' coffee a day?
SEOdojo SEO Training As a certification and training committee member for SeoPros I found theGypsy's SEO Dojo has the best SEO patent library available. Not to mention the incredible peeps to learn with and from! 
h_line1.gif (303 bytes)
Social Media Hangouts:

h_line1.gif (303 bytes)
T's Quote:

"What the mind of man can conceive and believe, It can achieve."

Napolean Hill ~ Think and Grow Rich

v_line.gif v_line.gif

DoJoPeeps to Checkout!
Steve Gerenscer AKA Feydakin
Animal Charms
h_line1.gif (303 bytes)
Webmaster T's New SEO recommendation service. Search engine marketing, campaign monitoring and certification. Rating real results from active campaigns and services. See your site like a search engine does!

search engine optimization articles
  Looking for something you've read in the past in the Blog area or T's qued for publishing. Check the search engine Webmaster T's optimization and SEO Blog archives. If it was on the cover you'll find it there.
h_line1.gif (303 bytes)
All the old search engine placement and web development articles are archived here. Watch the searchable Directory evolve from the archive.

T's World Logo,  cover and awards graphics 
by and Copyright 1997-2009  Markus Gemstad 
Copyright 1997-2009 International Website Builders all rights reserved.